Blurbs

Wikipedia defines blurbs in part as “. . . a short summary or some words of praise accompanying a creative work . . . ” Blurbs are often found on the back of book or DVD covers.

As I’m discovering, netting a blurb from an expert takes some wrangling, but the end result is worth it. A few nice words seldom hurt anyone. Some of these are still under construction, some are in hand. Below is a partial list of the blurb sources for The Last Track:

1) An adviser to the US government who has been stationed in all over the Middle East.

2) An active firefighter with FDNY ( Fire Department of New York ).

3) A writer of the best YA title in the last twenty-five years. << Not JK Rowling or Stephanie Meyer. I’m not writing about wizards or vampires. Don’t get me wrong I love wizards and vampires, and JK Rowling and Stephanie Meyer, and their audiences. Nor am i in any way suggesting that they are not great writers of YA, only that the author in question wrote a story that really clicked with me. So I am writing to them.

More on blurbs in the coming weeks. Till then, I have another novel to write.

Dude, where’s my book?

A few weeks ago,  the publisher pushed back releasing The Last Track from August 25, 2009 to a later date. I held off announcing anything until the new date was firm. Since it is, I can talk about it and why it was done.

The obvious concern with launching any new title ( or product ) is the economic landscape at the time of its release. This year has been pretty rough year on adult fiction. Lots of releases underwhelmed this year for no other reason than the economic back draft.

Proof of the trend, earlier this week the big seven publishers released their numbers and with the exception of Lagardere, who has Stephanie Meyer, every single major house had lower sales than during the same time period last year. Adjusting for the benefit of foreign currency exchange rates, which favor the big houses with a worldwide presence, sales at some houses ratcheted down as much as 20 percent.

Now here’s the good news amidst the bad. Despite all the bleeding in publishing, the broader market is flashing signs that the bottom is here or in the very near distance. The publisher feels, and I agree, that holiday sales and an extremely strong fall list from the majors will buoy spending on books. Spending in general seems to be on the uptick.

So that covers the macro view behind the reasoning for the new date.

Yet there are micro concerns justifying a later release. When I signed on, the marketing strategy and distribution hinged on a very simple concept: price. Originally the plan was a single trade paperback release, with electronic ( Kindle, Sony and Scribe ) to follow. The model was similar to Boondock Saints, which had a very brief theatrical release in three markets before landing as a $9.99 DVD. At the time, DVD’s averaged $17.99, so a lot of people gave that movie a try. I consider that a good thing, by the way. Now that the title has proven itself over time, the distributors charge more.

The only bad thing about the all trade paperback release is that it sidestepped the libraries. Initially that seemed OK, given that it was a first book, but the publisher sold me on looking at it another way.

Strong sales in the library market can propel a book into the land of mid-list very quickly. Because the publisher controls costs better than any business I’ve ever been inside, coming anywhere close to mid-list means everyone makes money. That also means I come back for round two. That makes me happy and hopefully people who like my writing happy.

In order to get into libraries, it takes two things: a hardcover release and a write up from one of the big review services. Major review services will only cover hardcover releases. And getting a review out of a review service takes 2-4 months. So then it becomes chicken and the egg. Currently the publisher is doing what’s necessary to get that review coverage. More on that in the coming weeks.

Speaking of release, the publisher is doing something unprecedented. A simultaneous hardcover, paperback and electronic release. The thinking is, if anyone wants a copy, they can pick whatever medium they prefer right then and there, rather than waiting for the paperback or Kindle. I’m honored to be the industry guinea pig.

And now the new release date. The publisher gave me a choice of two months, February or March. I opted for the sooner month. Then by the process of elimination, we picked the actual day.

Anyone who knows me well can probably guess how this negotiation ended. Yep, February 13th, 2010. My birthday.

Now if that doesn’t make up for getting pushed back, I don’t know what will.

Orphan

Some children are bad. Really bad. And in the case of the movie Oprhan, Esther is dreadful. Worse than Damien from the Omen even.

An adopted child from Estonia ( a small town near France ), she wins the hearts of a family who recently lost their own daughter.

Simply put, Esther is pure evil incarnate, but everything about her wickedness makes sense, given the back story. Orphan is a good, solid thriller. A worthwhile movie experience, though not for the weak of hearts. The first scene is possibly the most disturbing ever rendered on celluloid. After that it turns wicked, and I could not look away.

To those who champion the case of children in marriage and the value of adoption–stay the hell away from this film. It’s meant to entertain, not sell one on the merits or challenges of procreation, directly or by proxy.

What works:

1) The audio / visual synergy is particularly masterful. Sounds enhance the tension without calling attention to either.

2) Plot. Tight, well-delivered and believable.

3) Cast. A mix of unknowns and established actors, it’s a perfect blend. Esther ( Osabelle Fuhrman )is top shelf.

What needs improvement:

1) Yes, adoption proponents have much to hate about this film. I sympathize. But let it go. It’s a movie.

Verdict:

DVD purchase or matinee.

Pitter Patter

A really good friend of mine recently wondered what I thought about his lifestyle choices. By lifestyle choices, he meant being a parent, married to a beautiful and brilliant woman, and owning a home in a nice suburb.

The question on its face is kind of curious in a way, because that in essence is the American Dream. Of my friends, he perhaps comes the closest to living the much maligned but allegedly seldom realized vision. And honestly, he also probably appreciates what he has more than most, too.

My answer back? Basically, different people are suited for different kinds of lives. He embraces the dad and picket fence thing and I’m grateful for it, because I know there’s one person in the universe who’s going to add a hell of a lot more to this place than he’ll ever take. I know him well and I know the kinds of choices he makes, and have a pretty good idea about the sort of of values he’ll pass along to his son.

Also, there’s nothing wrong with wanting convention, any more than wanting something else. Though as I age I wonder how few opt for an alternative. At this point, very few of my married friends are childless. The simplest explanation: having a family is what works best for them. Therefore, full steam ahead. I wish you all the best.

In the moment though, I probably said something slighlty less about his prowess and more about me. Oh well. Here’s to getting the answer more right. Eventually.