To be honest, if the same letter came my way three years ago–possibly event two–I would have received the message differently; it’s amazing how years temper one’s defensive reactions.

I’m working behind the scenes with a dream team to address the agent’s concerns.

The fact that the agent gave detailed feedback is definitely a really good sign.

Another reason why agents don’t give feedback is that often, when they do, the writer will dash off an angry email rebutting the criticism. In a way you can’t blame the writer, it’s tempting (and a lot easier) to argue than to listen.

So they were taking a risk even giving you that feedback. And I’m sure they’ll be really happy that you responded the way you did. It shows you’re someone they can work with.

Spike, high five right back at you. And your suggestions persist in the manuscript as well.

The great part is knowing that 1) the idea is sound 2) someone is willing to give the story a chance. After three years, the doubts were many, though mercifully sporadic.

I’m pretty psyched. It’s going to be a lot of work, but much less than what writing the book required in the first place.